Wednesday, March 2, 2016

For those who miss my tweets ... here are some recent ones.


  1. Lindsey said nominating Trump or Cruz meant death to GOP in Nov. "Death by being shot or poisoning." Flip-flopping, Lindsey? 😳
  2. It appears plays neutral journalist when he chooses and expresses personal opinions at other times. That's okay but fuzzes lines
  3. || to give major address begging the #47% he rejected in 2012 who support to abandon Trump & vote for Establishment.🙄
  4. : who gave us the 47%, self-deportation & hidden tax returns is the last person to be wheeled out to take down 🙄
  5. : headline "Bernie Sanders isn't going anywhere". He's neither abandoning his political revolution nor creating one
  6. : campaign strengthening as candidate. Wrong. It's weakening chances to retain POTUS aft 8 yrs
  7. As I tweeted long ago, Trump opponents shd have done what Gingrich did to Romney w/ Bain Capital video. has done it. Use it.
  8. Pundits lacking historical perspective still talk of old guard as East Coast monied interests. BS. Nixon/Reagan overthrew them. Grow up
  9. . continues to field multiple panels filled w/shrill partisans like Jeff Lord, speed talker , uninformative .
  10. Unimpressed by political pundits. opined might well win Texas. Wrong. & that Trump on KKK was merely careless. Wrong 2x
  11. Viewed & tonite. MSNBC won. Better panels, not as scattered. & disappointing. CNN partisans terrible.
  12. . 's white male issue this time? Not Obama. Read article predicting Sanders winning OK re white workers
  13. If donors & operatives who want to defeat were at all smart, they'd begin by circulating 's video widely.
  14. Gosh , which candidate or office holder hasn't been flawed? Do you really think & are equally flawed?
  15. The thing about O'Donnell is that he talks so authoritatively but is so often wrong. Pawlenty as nominee? Trump will never run? 🙄😳
  16. Watching shout his way to analyzing contest. fading as analyst. Nothing meaningful said.
  17. .'s victory in Mass. primary tonight is significant given its proximity to ' Vermont & its liberal bent.
  18.  In reply to 
    . showed he could win in caucus states. Otherwise he did poorly, OK being an outlier, Vt his home.
  19. . further burnishing his credentials as the extreme right wing hope. But he'll never become the establishment candidate. Narrow lane
  20. . Don't simply describe 's behavior. Take responsibility for giving him more free TV exposure in a mock "press conference".
  21. Another example of mainstream media giving extended free exposure right now. . And then media wonders why he's doing well.
  22. While people are now listening to champion his leadership they should watch 's video exposing his emptiness
  23. looks like an undertaker in introducing tonight and standing behind him. Duh.

Tuesday, January 12, 2016

Wither Hillary?

The polls continue to tighten as Bernie Sanders closes the gap with Hillary nationally and takes a lead in Iowa. 

2008 redux? Is Hillary simply fated never to become president? I'm beginning to wonder. While I don't necessarily fault her for being critical of Sanders, she seemed a bit out of control most recently in attacking him on his healthcare proposals. I confess I do not know the details of his plan and the role states are to play in it. But, given his left wing orientation, I suspect trying to fault him for his plan will be a difficult sell. 

If Hillary loses both in Iowa and New Hampshire, I think she will have great difficulty winning the nomination. Sanders may not as yet be prepared to contest the primaries that immediately follow but his poll numbers will dramatically increase and her vulnerability will be exposed and will only grow. It would not surprise me if Joe Biden then makes another appearance as a possible candidate regardless of his currently stated position. I say that because I remain highly skeptical that Sanders can win the presidency even if he wins the nomination. Despite Obama's unexpected victory in 2008, which I did not anticipate, I simply do not see a 74-year-old, Brooklyn born, Jewish, self described socialist winning the presidency. I think the party elders would scramble and try to recruit Biden, who clearly would need no encouragement.

While at the moment I am sad at the prospect that Hillary will lose this nomination process, I am more seriously considering that I am simply unrepresentative of what the current Democratic Party has become. 

In recent correspondence with an old Princeton graduate student friend, I noted that I remain a pluralist who wants wealthy individuals and strong corporations as part of Anerican society, not to control our society and polity, but as a counterweight to a powerful government. I remain what I would call a Tocquevillian, concerned that equality and liberty are sometimes in tension with each other. I am not convinced that a Bernie Sanders America is quite my cup of tea. I would say that, at this point, I probably share less and less than in decades past with the rank-and-file of the Democratic Party. In fact, were someone like a Michael Bloomberg to run for president, I might find myself drawn to such a person.

My reaction to Obama's final State of the Union Address

I listened to it all but I got bored as the President droned on. Some uplifting passages but, overall, nothing new and nothing different. I don't disagree with Obama that our economy is the strongest in the world. And I share his perspective that we avoid an attempt at nation-building when it comes to every failed state. It's just that I had heard it all before. It was the same old same old and he failed to inspire me.

Friday, December 25, 2015

The incredible, unnerving pace of change

Even for a liberal, retired, baby boomer, the pace of change today is a bit unnerving.

Same sex marriage now endorsed by a majority of the Supreme Court. Transgender rights in the military now being recognized. Two minority women as the two most serious contenders to replace one of California's two long serving female U.S. Senators. Two Cuban men currently among the most likely Republican Party presidential nominees for the 2016 election. Barack Obama, the first African American U.S. President who was elected twice to the presidency, now entering his last year in office. Intolerance born of political correctness now threatening to dominate formerly liberal bastions of higher education. Long fought for reproductive rights for women threatened by older white men, a generation of sometimes passive younger women who didn't grow up in a period of back room abortions, and a movement to define "Personhood" as a constitutional standard to include the unborn. A current U.S. Supreme Court with no Protestant Justices. Century old, brick and mortar institutions of commerce, media and the like giving way to organizations such as Facebook built on an internet called the "World Wide Web". Smartphones everywhere even widespread in poverty stricken regions of the world. China emerging as a world power and major creditor of the United States. Thousands upon thousands of Muslim Middle Eastern refugees flooding into Europe possibly altering the faces of countries built upon their own ethnic identities and related nationalism. The emergence or reemergence of Islam as an organizing political ideology in many Muslim countries. Climate change in the form of global warming beginning to have a noticeable impact on everyday life. The disappearance of an American dominated uni-polar geopolitical world.

This pace of change is threatening to many, some of whom have become very receptive to leaders, movements, ideas and ideologies that pledge to slow the pace of change, provide seeming stability, and in many instances to restore a purportedly lost "natural order of things" that, not surprisingly, claims to resemble a past that never actually existed but that reflects an idealized past in the minds of those most threatened and stressed by these changes.